300 word count discussion post about judge Richard Posner

I need support with this Law question so I can learn better.

Please answer the following question with a 300-word response. You must also reply to at least two students with a 150-word response.

Judge Richard Posner of the 7th Circuit was quoted as saying:

“And on another note about academia and practical law, I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries—well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments). Eighteenth-century guys, however smart, could not foresee the culture, technology, etc., of the 21^st century. Which means that the original Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the post–Civil War amendments (including the 14^th), do not speak to today.”

The entire article written by Judge Posner can be found at:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_breakfast_table/features/2016/supreme_court_breakfast_table_for_june_2016/law_school_professors_need_more_practical_experience.html?wpsrc=sh_all_mob_tw_top

1) Do you agree with Judge Posner that there is no value in studying the U.S. Constitution? Explain your position.