I need support with this Business question so I can learn better.
Option #3: Leadership and Teams – Conformity
As a manager of a team attempting to improve your skills, submit your response to the following statements:
- Determine if the desire to be accepted as a member of a group leaves an employee susceptible to conforming to the group’s norms.
- Decide if a group can exert pressure that’s strong enough to change a member’s attitudes and behavior.
- Examine a leadership model (a valid one, by today’s research standards, as discussed in this module’s materials) that would have the most impact on your team performance.
- Explain how you can use this analysis to help you be a better manager.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content, analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing, which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics appropriately. Although three outside scholarly sources are required for this paper, remember that you can always improve your work by providing support from additional outside scholarly sources, which helps both to bolster your own assertions and supplement your ideas.
Business Management and Administration Library Guide
A Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. The Library Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within the library that are designed to support this specific course. Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide (Links to an external site.).
Recommended
- Lacroix, M. (2017). Can servant leaders fuel the leadership fire? The relationship between servant leadership and followers’ leadership avoidance. Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 6.
- Nebojsa P. (2016). Are authentic leaders satisfied with their job? International Journal for Quality Research, 10(2), 325-340.
- Tao, Jun, Jiang, Wanxing, Liu, Chang, Yang, Xin, Zhang, Weiguo, & Zhang, Haomin. (2017). New employee intention to leave and consequent work performance: Does leadership style matter? Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(10), 1707-1722.
- Capsim Inbox. (n.d.). Developing your skills [Video file]. Retrieved from https://downstream-to-capsim-customers.s3.amazonaws.com/production/videos/CapsimINBOX/Welcome%20to%20Capsim%20Inbox_v3.mp
Rubric
MGT300 Mod 3 CT
MGT300 Mod 3 CT
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements
|
|
15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation
The paper demonstrates an understanding of theoretical leadership models or the paper demonstrates an understanding of ethical issues in leadership and teams. The paper includes all of the required components as specified in the assignment, 3-4 pages in length, APA formatting, and scholarly sources.
|
12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation
The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation
The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
|
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources, and references key concepts with in-text citations to support answers.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking
|
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.
|
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis
|
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis on the application of theoretical leadership models in leadership and teams or an analysis of ethical issues in leadership and teams.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.
|
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples
|
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the perspectives on the assignment.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment.
|
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
|
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
|
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style.
|
|
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
|
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 75.0
|
