I don’t know how to handle this Law question and need guidance.
Instructions
Discuss the importance of the landmark case Miranda v. Arizona. Now pick one of the following cases: Berghuis v. Thompkins, Maryland v. Shatzer, McNabb v. United States, or Minnick v. Mississippi, and discuss its significance to interviewing and interrogation. Is there a relationship between the case that you chose and Miranda v. Arizona? If there is, discuss that relationship as it relates to interview and interrogation.
Your response should be at least 300 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
