Read instructions and rubric carefully:
Option #2: Individual Healthcare Rights
In a PowerPoint presentation, discuss the importance of patient rights and the responsibility of the provider and the organization to protect these rights. Envision that the presentation will be used as a training mechanism for employees. Research and examine the different rights that patients have and how the staff can work to safeguard these rights. Include a discussion of the new patients†bill of rights and explain each of the following areas:
Patients†right to access affordable health insurance,
Patients†right to emergency care,
Employees†right to sue employers, and
Patients†right to accountability by health insurers.
Your PowerPoint presentation should meet the following requirements:
Be organized using professional themes and transitions.
Consist of 8-9 slides including the title and reference slides.
Include speaker notes (minimum 75 words) on all slides.
Follow the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed from the Module 2 folder.
Reach out to your instructor if you have any questions about the assignment.
Rubric
HCM345 Mod 2 CT
HCM345 Mod 2 CT
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
25.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
10.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
25.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.
10.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in Healthcare Ethics
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are lessâ€than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 120.0
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
