The Research Paper shall focus on developing a leadership plan for addressing the leadership issues identified in the Case Study. The research paper should apply the knowledge and skills gained from the required courses of the major and your application of the leadership concepts presented in this course.
The body of the Research Paper shall be 10-12 pages, excluding other material such as the cover page, table of contents, abstract, graphics and tables, and references. The paper shall be presented in APA (6th edition) format, all margins should be 1”, 12 point font, and be in either Arial or New Times Roman font style. In the following descending order of preference, information sources must be either peer-reviewed articles, government reports, or other sources approved by your instructor. Internet information sources from other than authoritative sources are discouraged. See the Research Paper grading rubric for more information.
Some key points to consider include:
When developing a leadership plan for addressing the issue, ensure the plan covers how the chain of command, leadership style, and or the process is executed. You are cautioned to not make the plan all about the special gadget, or policy that was utilized.
You should consider using one of the leadership approaches discussed in Ethical Leadership and Competing Stakeholders Module (Module 4)
Explain how the plan was managed and or controlled because of the leadership of the agency or department involved
Do not take-up most of the paper’s 8-12 pages describing the issue already identified in the previous case study; summarize the case study as briefly as possible.
A majority of the paper should be about the leadership process
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
THESIS OR STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
5 POINTS
Readily apparent to the reader; concisely stated in a single sentence, which is engaging and thought provoking.
4 POINTS
Clear but may sometimes digresses in the paper; stated in a single sentence.
3 POINTS
Not consistently clear; stated in a single sentence.
2 POINTS
Generally unclear; Incomplete, unfocused, or absent.
INTRODUCTION
5 POINTS
Relevance of Public Safety leadership is apparent. The groundwork for paper easy to predict because important topics that will be discussed are specifically mentioned.
4 POINTS
A good attempt is made as to why the topic is pertinent but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. Organization for rest of the paper stated
3 POINTS
May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper.
2 POINTS
No reference to the topic, audience or relevance.
CONTENT
30 POINTS
Can earn from 27-30 points. Clear examples to support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; support of the overall purpose; reader gains important insight; analysis poses novel ways to think of the material; quoted material well integrated; depth of coverage without being redundant.
26 POINTS
Can earn from 24-26 points. Examples support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; reader gains some insight; occasional evidence of novel ways to think about the material Quotes well integrated into sentences. Topics adequately addressed but not in detail or depth.
23 POINTS
Can earn from 21-23 points. Examples support the leadership style with clear presentation of current challenge; reader gains little insight; The essay relies on quotes and paraphrasing that are poorly connected. Examples support some topic sentences; no evidence of novel thinking and intermittent support through evidence.
20 POINTS
Can earn from 0-20 points. The essay relies on stringing together quotes or close paraphrasing; Failure to support statements with major content omitted; Quotes not integrated, improperly.
ORGANIZATION AND CRITICAL THINKING
10 POINTS
Can earn from 9-10 points. The ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose. Conclusions are supported by evidence Transitions link paragraphs. It’s easy to follow the line reasoning. Subheadings are used throughout the paper allowing the reader to reader moves easily through the text. Paragraphs have solid topic sentences.
8 POINTS
The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose. Conclusions are clearly stated. Transitions usually link paragraphs. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. Subheadings are used throughout the paper to guide the reader without undue confusion; a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences.
7 POINTS
In general, ideas are arranged logically, but sometimes ideas fail to make sense together or result in conclusions. The reader is fairly clear about what writer intends. While subheadings are used, the content beneath them does not follow; many paragraphs without topic sentences.
6 POINTS
Can earn from 0-6 points. Ideas are not logically. Organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning. Subheadings not used. Few or no topic sentences.
SENTENCE STRUCTURE
5 POINTS
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and type. They flow smoothly from one to another with no run on sentences or comma splices.
4 POINTS
Sentences are correct with minor variety in length and structure. The flow from sentence to sentence is generally smooth although some run on sentences are present.
3 POINTS
Some sentences are awkwardly constructed so that the reader is occasionally distracted. Run on sentences are present or Short, simple and compound sentences prevail.
2 POINTS
Errors in sentence structure are frequent enough to be a major distraction to the reader. Run no’s and fragments common.
WORD CHOICE
5 POINTS
Word choice is consistently precise and accurate. The writer uses the active voice.
4 POINTS
Word choice is generally good. The writer often finds words that are more precise and effective. Unnecessary words are occasionally used.
3 POINTS
Word choice is merely adequate, and the range of words is limited. Some words are used inappropriately. Unnecessary words are fairly common.
2 POINTS
Many words are used inappropriately, confusing the reader. It is difficult for the reader to understand what the writer is trying to express.
GRAMMAR, SPELLING, WRITING MECHANICS (PUNCTUATION, ITALICS, CAPITALIZATION, ETC.)
10 POINTS
Can earn between 9-10 points. Essentially free of grammatical errors; The writing is free or almost free of errors.
8 POINTS
A few grammatical errors; There are occasional errors, but they don’t represent a major distraction or obscure meaning.
7 POINTS
Several grammatical errors; The writing has many errors, and the reader is distracted by them.
1 POINT
Can earn between 0-6 points. Pattern of ungrammatical writing; There are so many errors that meaning is obscured. The reader is confused and stops reading.
CONCLUSION
10 POINTS
Can earn from 9-10 points. The writer makes succinct and precise conclusions and/or recommendations Suggestions for future leadership approaches clearly stated.
8 POINTS
Some of the conclusions and recommendations, however, are not supported. Suggestions for future leadership approaches are offered.
7 POINTS
Some of the conclusions and recommendations, however, are not supported; weak or trite suggestions for future.
6 POINTS
Can earn from 0-6 points. There is little or no indication that the writer tried to synthesize the information or to draw conclusions or make recommendations; no suggestions for future.
REFERENCE QUALITY (INFORMATION LITERACY)
10 POINTS
Can earn from 9-10 points. References are primarily peer reviewed professional journals or other approved sources; Numerous relevant scholarly sources (and primary sources, where available and appropriate) demonstrating extensive, in-depth research; little reliance on tertiary sources.
8 POINTS
Although most of the references are professionally legitimate, a few are questionable (e.g., trade books, internet sources, popular magazines, etc). Several relevant secondary sources, revealing adequate research.
7 POINTS
Most of the references are from sources that are not peer reviewed and have uncertain reliability. Several relevant secondary sources, more than one tertiary source; some facts not referenced; displays minimal effort in selecting quality sources.
6 POINTS
Can earn from 0-6 points. There are virtually no sources that are professionally reliable. Over-reliance on tertiary sources; spotty documentation of facts in text.
APA FORMAT
5 POINTS
APA format is used accurately and consistently in the paper and on the “References” page. The references in the list match the in-text citations and all were properly encoded in APA format.
4 POINTS
APA is used with minor errors. Some formatting problems exist, or some components are missing. No more than one or two citation errors.
3 POINTS
There are several errors in APA format. Format. References or Works Cited list were not cited in the text.
2 POINTS
Format of the document is not recognizable as APA format; References or Works Cited list were not cited in the text. Pattern of citation errors.
LENGTH
5 POINTS
When using the proper font, font size and margins, the body of the paper is between 8 and 12 pages.
4 POINTS
The paper is varies from the prescribed length by no more than one page.
3 POINTS
The paper is varies from the prescribed length by no more than two pages.
2 POINTS
Can earn from 0-2 points. The paper is varies from the prescribed length by more than two pages.
Overall Score
A GRADE90 OR MORE
B GRADE80 OR MORE
C GRADE70 OR MORE
D OR F GRADE0 OR MORE
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
The post Homeland Security (HMLS 495) Research Paper help appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.
